<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carry bits and group cohomology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/</link>
	<description>Because my LiveJournal is too silly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:28:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primary School Arithmetic and Group Cohomology &#171; Mathematics under the Microscope</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-150616</link>
		<dc:creator>Primary School Arithmetic and Group Cohomology &#171; Mathematics under the Microscope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-150616</guid>
		<description>[...] that he had been speaking prose all his life. I was recently reminded (by Mikael Johanssons&#8217; blog) tha tall my life I was calculating 2-cocycles.Indeed, a carry in elementary arithmetic, a digit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that he had been speaking prose all his life. I was recently reminded (by Mikael Johanssons&#8217; blog) tha tall my life I was calculating 2-cocycles.Indeed, a carry in elementary arithmetic, a digit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More math education &#171; The Unapologetic Mathematician</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-11250</link>
		<dc:creator>More math education &#171; The Unapologetic Mathematician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-11250</guid>
		<description>[...] manipulations for any student to understand why before how. I only just recently found out (via Michi&#8217;s blog) that place-value addition &#8220;really&#8221; arises from group cohomology. Did my not knowing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manipulations for any student to understand why before how. I only just recently found out (via Michi&#8217;s blog) that place-value addition &#8220;really&#8221; arises from group cohomology. Did my not knowing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michi</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-7979</link>
		<dc:creator>Michi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-7979</guid>
		<description>increpation: You are, of course right, in general. For the full Hochschild cocycle condition, you&#039;ll want the last term to be right multiplied by c as well.

The clou here is that in the group cohomology ring
H(G,Z/10)
in which we&#039;re doing all of this, we end up actually viewing Z/10 as a trivial module; thus vanishing all the left and right actions outside the f.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>increpation: You are, of course right, in general. For the full Hochschild cocycle condition, you&#8217;ll want the last term to be right multiplied by c as well.</p>
<p>The clou here is that in the group cohomology ring<br />
H(G,Z/10)<br />
in which we&#8217;re doing all of this, we end up actually viewing Z/10 as a trivial module; thus vanishing all the left and right actions outside the f.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: increpatio</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-7928</link>
		<dc:creator>increpatio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-7928</guid>
		<description>By comparison with the planetmath and wikipedia entries on group cohomology, should the cocycle condition

f(b,c)-f(a*b,c)+f(a,b*c)-f(a,b)=0

have the first term multiplied by a?

Of course, then it&#039;s wrong; unless you&#039;re defining some sort of trivial action I&#039;m not seeing.

(I would like to get the example clear in my head; I don&#039;t know enough group cohomology : ( )

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By comparison with the planetmath and wikipedia entries on group cohomology, should the cocycle condition</p>
<p>f(b,c)-f(a*b,c)+f(a,b*c)-f(a,b)=0</p>
<p>have the first term multiplied by a?</p>
<p>Of course, then it&#8217;s wrong; unless you&#8217;re defining some sort of trivial action I&#8217;m not seeing.</p>
<p>(I would like to get the example clear in my head; I don&#8217;t know enough group cohomology : ( )</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Per Vognsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>Per Vognsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. If you go to Google Groups and search for old posts by James Dolan you&#039;ll find a handful of posts where he talks about this connection in quite some detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. If you go to Google Groups and search for old posts by James Dolan you&#8217;ll find a handful of posts where he talks about this connection in quite some detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Borovik</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Borovik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>A nice one. It is one of those observations which deserve to be much wider known. I have no Knuth on hands, it would be interesting to check whether he mentions this property of carries in his &quot;Art of computer programming&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice one. It is one of those observations which deserve to be much wider known. I have no Knuth on hands, it would be interesting to check whether he mentions this property of carries in his &#8220;Art of computer programming&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigfpe</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>sigfpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2006/07/carry-bits-and-group-cohomology/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Part of this was originally presented to me as a joke. You can only tell it to someone who&#039;s a good enough mathematician to understand basic group cohohmology but who hasn&#039;t actually studied it yet. (This must count as the smallest demographic for a joke - but I was roughly in it at the time.) You say &quot;I bet you&#039;ve been doing group cohomology since you were a kid&quot; and when they deny it you start describing the 2-cycle above and wait for them to get it. While not particularly funny, it does have the unique virtue of being a joke, not about mathematics, or mathematicians, but completely *in* mathematics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of this was originally presented to me as a joke. You can only tell it to someone who&#8217;s a good enough mathematician to understand basic group cohohmology but who hasn&#8217;t actually studied it yet. (This must count as the smallest demographic for a joke &#8211; but I was roughly in it at the time.) You say &#8220;I bet you&#8217;ve been doing group cohomology since you were a kid&#8221; and when they deny it you start describing the 2-cycle above and wait for them to get it. While not particularly funny, it does have the unique virtue of being a joke, not about mathematics, or mathematicians, but completely *in* mathematics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

