Comments on: Going to T’bilisi http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/ Because my LiveJournal is too silly Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:50:59 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Carnival of Mathematics IX « JD2718 http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/comment-page-1/#comment-14853 Carnival of Mathematics IX « JD2718 Sat, 02 Jun 2007 14:24:56 +0000 http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/#comment-14853 [...] will be Considering Cohomology in the Caucasus. [...] [...] will be Considering Cohomology in the Caucasus. [...]

]]> By: Michi http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/comment-page-1/#comment-14504 Michi Wed, 30 May 2007 04:28:00 +0000 http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/#comment-14504 John: I'm glad you read the slides. Thanks for the example and the comment - but I don't think it essentially changes my argument, namely that a naïve approach to lifting the restriction maps from cohomology to the Aoo-structures seems doomed from the start. The actual talk went very well, and I'm enjoying a sunny and very hot T'bilisi right now. John: I’m glad you read the slides. Thanks for the example and the comment – but I don’t think it essentially changes my argument, namely that a naïve approach to lifting the restriction maps from cohomology to the Aoo-structures seems doomed from the start.

The actual talk went very well, and I’m enjoying a sunny and very hot T’bilisi right now.

]]> By: John Palmieri http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/comment-page-1/#comment-14471 John Palmieri Tue, 29 May 2007 21:20:16 +0000 http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2007/05/going-to-tbilisi/#comment-14471 I'm about a week too late, but I don't agree with your statement on p. 16 of the notes that if H is a subgroup of G, then the induced map on cohomology is surjective. (Consider C_2 inside C_4.) Maybe the lack of surjectivity makes it easier to understand the induced map of A-infinity algebras? I’m about a week too late, but I don’t agree with your statement on p. 16 of the notes that if H is a subgroup of G, then the induced map on cohomology is surjective. (Consider C_2 inside C_4.) Maybe the lack of surjectivity makes it easier to understand the induced map of A-infinity algebras?

]]>