<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So that must mean I&#8217;ve been a mathematician since 2005?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/</link>
	<description>Because my LiveJournal is too silly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:28:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michi</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-147599</link>
		<dc:creator>Michi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-147599</guid>
		<description>Tristram: I know about and read Ben Goldacre. One of the main reasons for this blog post was that Ben hadn&#039;t posted his rant yet when I wrote it - otherwise I might have channeled my own annoyance into a comment at his blog instead.

I&#039;ve heard more people talk about William Hartston with favourable tones, so he&#039;s probably a decent guy with bad editing instead of the complete fool he looks like in that article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristram: I know about and read Ben Goldacre. One of the main reasons for this blog post was that Ben hadn&#8217;t posted his rant yet when I wrote it &#8211; otherwise I might have channeled my own annoyance into a comment at his blog instead.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard more people talk about William Hartston with favourable tones, so he&#8217;s probably a decent guy with bad editing instead of the complete fool he looks like in that article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristram Brelstaff</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-147534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristram Brelstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-147534</guid>
		<description>I agree with Harald, Ben Goldacre is excellent and I delegate all my ranting about bad science to him. He has a post on this type of story &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badscience.net/2008/12/transparent-excuse-for-printing-a-nice-pair-of-hooters/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

I remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Hartston&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William Hartston&lt;/a&gt; from the 1970&#039;s as an international chess master and author of several good chess books; some serious: &quot;The Benoni&quot; and &quot;The Gruenfeld Defence&quot;; some not so serious: &quot;How to Cheat at Chess&quot; and &quot;Soft Pawn&quot;.  But nowadays he is the current writer of the distinctly surreal &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beachcomber_(pen_name)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Beachcomber&lt;/a&gt; column in the Daily Express newspaper.  I suspect that the Sun journalists just phoned him up with a few questions and then twisted what he said to fit their story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Harald, Ben Goldacre is excellent and I delegate all my ranting about bad science to him. He has a post on this type of story <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2008/12/transparent-excuse-for-printing-a-nice-pair-of-hooters/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>I remember <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Hartston" rel="nofollow">William Hartston</a> from the 1970&#8242;s as an international chess master and author of several good chess books; some serious: &#8220;The Benoni&#8221; and &#8220;The Gruenfeld Defence&#8221;; some not so serious: &#8220;How to Cheat at Chess&#8221; and &#8220;Soft Pawn&#8221;.  But nowadays he is the current writer of the distinctly surreal <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beachcomber_(pen_name)" rel="nofollow">Beachcomber</a> column in the Daily Express newspaper.  I suspect that the Sun journalists just phoned him up with a few questions and then twisted what he said to fit their story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pozorvlak</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-147190</link>
		<dc:creator>pozorvlak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-147190</guid>
		<description>Tom: Oxford does the same. In their defence, they&#039;ve been doing it since long before the concept of a bachelor&#039;s degree existed.

[My own Oxford master&#039;s, being an MMath rather than an MA, was earned.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: Oxford does the same. In their defence, they&#8217;ve been doing it since long before the concept of a bachelor&#8217;s degree existed.</p>
<p>[My own Oxford master's, being an MMath rather than an MA, was earned.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michi</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-146668</link>
		<dc:creator>Michi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-146668</guid>
		<description>@drscrooge: Though if you look at the article, the formula is something like O = NP(blah)/blah, where N is supposed to be &quot;nipples exposed&quot;. So the arithmetic example given is what they claim they want to compute, and it still comes out to nonsense. Essentially, the formula they have is saying that without any actually exposed nipples, breasts cannot be obscene.

@Harald: I know. I have his LiveJournal feed in my list.

@Tom: That just makes it even scarier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@drscrooge: Though if you look at the article, the formula is something like O = NP(blah)/blah, where N is supposed to be &#8220;nipples exposed&#8221;. So the arithmetic example given is what they claim they want to compute, and it still comes out to nonsense. Essentially, the formula they have is saying that without any actually exposed nipples, breasts cannot be obscene.</p>
<p>@Harald: I know. I have his LiveJournal feed in my list.</p>
<p>@Tom: That just makes it even scarier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-146667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-146667</guid>
		<description>Even worse, at Cambridge you get an MA for free 4 years after graduating. (It&#039;s a bit hard to find a link on this since googling for Cambridge+MA invariably lands me on the wrong side of the atlantic). But he really just has an undergrad degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even worse, at Cambridge you get an MA for free 4 years after graduating. (It&#8217;s a bit hard to find a link on this since googling for Cambridge+MA invariably lands me on the wrong side of the atlantic). But he really just has an undergrad degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harald Korneliussen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-146630</link>
		<dc:creator>Harald Korneliussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-146630</guid>
		<description>Ben Goldacre had a whole chapter on such formulas in his book &quot;Bad Science&quot;, which is apparently based on a blog. If you need to read someone who shares your frustrations, it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badscience.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Goldacre had a whole chapter on such formulas in his book &#8220;Bad Science&#8221;, which is apparently based on a blog. If you need to read someone who shares your frustrations, it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.badscience.net/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drscrooge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/archive/2008/12/so-that-must-mean-ive-been-a-mathematician-since-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-146616</link>
		<dc:creator>drscrooge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mikael.johanssons.org/?p=185#comment-146616</guid>
		<description>0x =&gt; O= and the computation makes sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0x =&gt; O= and the computation makes sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

