Today, with my bright topology 9th-graders, we discussed homotopy equivalence of spaces and the fundamental groupoid. In order to get the arguments sorted out, and also in order to give my esteemed readership a chance to see what I’m doing with them, I’ll write out some of the arguments here.
I will straight off assume that continuity is something everyone’s comfortable with, and build on top of that.
We say that two continuous maps, f,g:X→Y between topological spaces are homotopical, and write
, if there is a continuous map
such that H(x,0)=f(x) and H(x,1)=g(x). This captures the intuitive idea of step by step nudging one map into the other in formal terms.
Two spaces X,Y are homeomorphic if there are maps
,
such that
and
.
Two spaces X,Y are homotopy equivalent if there are maps
,
such that
and
.
Today, I started an experiment together with the local specialised secondary school. I’ll be taking care of two of their brightest students, meeting them roughly once a week, and taking them on a charge through algebraic topology. At the far end shimmers knot theory and other funky applications; and on the way there, I hope for many interesting spinoffs and avenues.
They got, today, Armstrong’s Basic Topology, and an extract from the German topology book by Jänich, and on monday, we shall go over the formal definition of topological spaces, and of continuous functions together.
I plan to keep updates on our progress here on the blog - with the questions I send them off with each meeting as well as some sort of discussion about how this setup is working out, if at all.
For the first trip, the questions I dumped in their laps were:
with the standard topology on
with the standard topology on
with the discrete topology
with the finite-complement topology